Overheads for clinical research.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Improving Runtime Overheads for detectEr
Runtime Verification (RV) [11] is a lightweight verification technique mitigating the scalability issues associated with exhaustive verification techniques such as model checking. Low overheads are an important requirement for the viability of any RV framework, where the additional computation introduced by the monitors should ideally be kept to a minimum. detectEr[3, 7] is an RV tool for analy...
متن کاملAutomatic Overheads Profiler for OpenMP Codes
To develop a good parallel implementation requires understanding of where run-time is spent and comparing this to some realistic best possible time. We introduce “overhead analysis” as a way of comparing achieved performance with achievable performance. We present a tool, OVALTINE, which aims to provide, automatically, the user with a hierarchical set of overheads for a given OpenMP implementat...
متن کاملQuantifying MultiProcessor Overheads
As a general rule, most performance analysts are confident in fundamental relationships like one plus one equals two. Unfortunately, this time proven relationship is a gross over estimation of the actual capacity delivered by a dual or multiprocessor configurations. In this paper, we will present a simple conceptual model of multiprocessor performance and provide a generalized first order resul...
متن کاملReducing Scheduling Overheads for Concurrent Logic Programs
Strictness analysis is crucial for the efficient implementation of the lazy flmctionM languages. A related technique for the concurrent logic languages (CLLs) called schedule analysis is presented which divides at compile-time a CLL program into threads of totally ordered atoms, whose relative ordering is determined at run-time. The technique enables the enqueuing and dequeuing of processes to ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BMJ
سال: 1992
ISSN: 0959-8138,1468-5833
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6822.318-d